The Fund That Beat The Market 9 Times Since 1999

This fund beat the S&P 500 9 times since '99Managed a 10% return last year? Not good enough – the S&P returned 12%!

Beating the market is all the rage these days (and has always been at Wall Street). Take the ad for any actively managed mutual fund, the benchmark is not whether the fund made money for you, but whether they beat the S&P 500! Of course, fund managers use sophisticated algorithms to try to beat the market and make up for the effort by charging hefty fees.

So if a fund is charging above average fees, common sense dictates its performance should be above average as well, right?

I want to highlight some of these super expensive funds that charge a pretty penny for their superior performance. For this little experiment, I’ve chosen 3 funds,

  • that have at least been around for the past 12 years,
  • are top performers in the large cap category and
  • have high fees.

All 3 funds are compared against Vanguard’s S&P 500 fund VFINX, rather than the absolute index, for an apples-to-apples comparison.

1. Pacific Advisors Large Cap Value A (PAGTX)


The objective of PAGTX is long term capital appreciation. 80% of its assets are from the S&P 500 based on an actively managed, value based approach for long term capital appreciation.


This fund has an expense ratio that is more than twice the industry average at a whopping 3.05%. In addition, there is a front end load of 5.75%, which means you when you purchase this fund, you pay a one time fee of 5.75% of your investment. This is in addition to the recurring fee of 3.05% every year. What about 12b-1 fees? You bet! 0.24%. 12b-1 fees are ‘administrative fees’, fund companies charge.

A 10 year projection for a $10,000 investment in this fund comes to a whopping $5280 just in fees!

And to put that 3.05% expense ratio into perspective, consider this – the average annual return of the S&P 500 from 1999 – 2010 was -0.50% after adjusting for inflation!


So for this hefty premium, what does the investor get in return? From 1999-2010, this fund has managed to beat the S&P 500 just 4 times averaging a return of just 0.4% vs S&P (VFINX)’s 3.9%!

2. Performance Large Cap Equity B (PFEBX)

This fund managed by Douglas Ralston, seeks long capital appreciation and invests 80% of its assets in the largest of firms from the S&P 500.


PFEBX has an expense ratio of 2.01% higher than the industry average of 1.12%, a deferred sales load of 5%, i.e., you pay when you sell as opposed to a front end load where you pay when you buy. There is also a 12b-1 fee of 1%.


This fund has managed to beat the S&P 500 just 4 times from 1999-2010.

Its best return during that period was an 18.85% return in 2003 against VFINX’s 28.5%.

Note: This fund no longer exists (it did when I started preparing this post). This has been consolidated with Federated Funds as of September 21, 2012.

3. Sparrow Growth A (SGFFX)

This fund seeks long term capital appreciation based on a proprietary trading model developed by its advisors. SGFFX invests in both domestic and foreign securities and may invest upto 15% of its assets in investment grade fixed income funds.


This fund has an expense ratio of 2.28% and a front end load of 5.75%. 12-1b fees are capped at 0.50%. A 10 year expense projection per $10,000 comes to $3368 in fees.


This fund has managed to beat the S&P 500 6 times with an average return of 2.63% for the period 1999-2010.

It’s worst return was in 2008 when it lost 46.26% of its value (as opposed to S&P’s 37.02%).

This Stellar Fund Beat The Market 9 Times Since 1999!

Finally, I have this fund that has managed to beat the S&P 500 index 9 times since 1999 and has an annualized return of 8.45% since inception. This is also one of my favorite funds.

Objective, Fees & Returns

Here’s how this fund compares to the above three funds mentioned above.

Awesome Fund!
Average Return since '990.40%0.51%2.63%5.07%
Beaten S&P 500 since '99 4 times4 times6 times9 times
Expense Ratio 3.05%2.01%2.28%0.17%
12b-1 0.24%1.00%0.50%0.00%
Projected Expense/$10K$5280$2181$3368$230

The projected expense is no typo! That’s just $230 for 10 years and this fund beats the most expensive funds out there including the S&P 500 (3.93 vs 5.07) for the same period.

Would you like to know the fund manager and the fund’s objective? Actually both are irrelevant! This is a passive fund, no secret sauce to the returns, and the objective, well just to hold almost all the stocks in the market!

Yes, this is the total stock market index fund from Vanguard (VTSMX). This represents the entire stock market. Why pick and choose when you can own everything!

Go over that statistics once again. Better returns, negligible costs and best of all, simplicity. None of the funds comes even close to the returns posted by VTSMX.

When it comes to investing, you have no control over future performance, but you do have control over expenses. Pick funds with low fees. Fees matter.

So why do people chase expensive, actively managed funds when they could just choose a low cost index fund alternative?

Buffett said it best:

There seems to be some perverse human characteristic that likes to make easy things difficult.

Photo credit: Lisa Solonynko

Tagged with  
, , , ,

18 thoughts on “The Fund That Beat The Market 9 Times Since 1999

  1. Welcome back.

    I didn’t believe you about PAGTX, but it’s true. Don’t feel too bad, according to the profile for this fund, it has less than $5m of invested funds. A similar situation for SGFFX as well.

    • Thanks SFI! I have a lot of catching up to do. I do apologize for the absence.

      What shocks me is that these are not new funds, but funds that have been around for a while. I pity those who have these funds in their 401Ks.

  2. The reason people choose these funds is because they don’t know there are better alternatives. Even 401(k) fund administrators who should know better succumb to fast talking fund salespeople. Sadly, it ruins people’s retirement.
    The good news is that these issues are becoming more transparent every day.

  3. Welcome back MoneyCone! Will mention in the next weekly lineup.

    AS DIY Investor points out, there are always better alternatives to actively managed funds. In Millionaire Teacher, Andrew Hallam went through a whole chapter on how mutual funds have a short-shelf life, especially after they performed poorly for a few years. Unfortunately that was other people’s money. ;)

    The Dividend Ninja

    • Thanks DN! I do apologize for the long absence and I’m glad to be back!

      I do have AH’s book. A very practical book indeed. Makes a strong case for indexing and best of all, shows how anyone with a modest income can get decent returns with minimum risk.

  4. Great to see you back in action, MC! I am a big fan of all the Vanguard funds. I agree with you that major % of your portfolio should be allocated to the Vanguard total market index fund.

  5. Maggie@SquarePennies says:

    So glad to see you back, MC! You have obviously done your homework on these and I appreciate it! We are among those who have mainly a 401k. Unfortunately we fear risk in the market, but I will consider these funds for a portion of our investments. Thanks for all the information!

    • Just wanted to add that we are already invested in some stocks, but mainly ones that we consider inflation hedges. Since we are retired, we take on less risk than most people. Thanks!

      • Thanks for chiming in Maggie! The fund, VTSMX represents the entire stock market and is passively indexed. Much safer than holding individual stocks. And as the post points out, this simple fund has beaten most of the actively managed funds and at a fraction of the cost.

  6. I like this — just… simple. Easy to follow, easy to understand, and easy to implement! Thanks.

  7. Hey there MC! Nice to see you’re back. It’s nuts how high the fees are on some funds. I won’t pay towards any management fees if I can help it. It takes more time and paying attention to the fine print but it’s worth it imo.

    • Thanks Untemplater! When there are better alternatives, why choose expensive funds? I’ll blame our current 401K set up. High time we had some reforms there.

  8. Yo MC, where ya been? Great breakdown! Sadly, most people, including myself are delusional when it comes to playing the stock market. “We can beat 10% and the S&P! Step aside and watch the pro in action.” We can’t ignore the fact that very few mutual funds out there that actually beats the S&P. I need to wake up!

  9. The performance is amazing. I could not help to ask – if it does represents entire market, how could it possibly beat it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>